we prefer Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> irregular <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-a" or Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-a" (all <span class="searchmatch">en</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> -a are irregular)? Please...
irregular <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-<span class="searchmatch">en</span>"", to match other similar subcategories? (If so, "Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-a"" and "Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> ending...
04:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Per the above, I'm moving all of them into a Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-<span class="searchmatch">en</span>". Cheers! bd2412 T 15:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)...
Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> irregular <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-i", Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> irregular <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-ae", Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-<span class="searchmatch">en</span>", Category:English...
set me straight though - these are <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> of <span class="searchmatch">English</span> words that don't make a "regular" <span class="searchmatch">plural</span>? So <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span> <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> ... would be a different category...
instances of this morpheme <span class="searchmatch">in</span> a certain phonological environment, which is completely predictable. When it comes to <span class="searchmatch">English</span> -<span class="searchmatch">en</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span>, they are exceptions...
made real) like Category:<span class="searchmatch">plural</span> of without lang. Such a category would contain pretty much all of Category:<span class="searchmatch">English</span> <span class="searchmatch">plurals</span>, and furthermore all such...
-<span class="searchmatch">en</span>, although there are also words with -<span class="searchmatch">en</span> that are not verbs. <span class="searchmatch">In</span> Esperanto, all (polysyllabic) words <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> -i are verbs, and all verbs end <span class="searchmatch">in</span> -i...
have a <span class="searchmatch">plural</span>. I suppose the only couple of examples that come to me <span class="searchmatch">in</span> <span class="searchmatch">English</span> are sheep and salmon. You can't tell me that there is no <span class="searchmatch">plural</span> of sheep...
probably a bad example of a noun <span class="searchmatch">ending</span> <span class="searchmatch">in</span> "-cy" since it is a counter example (contains "cie") without having to be <span class="searchmatch">pluralized</span>. Perhaps Intricacy, Pharmacy...